TUiD tries to deduce
TUiD is left with a feeling that investigations and deductions appear to returning to the same place
Who is Mr & Mrs Duplicitous or Mr & Mr Duplicitous or Mrs Miss or Ms's Duplicitous and who are all their children?
Are they being forced to stalk?
Who has always been the duplicitous one?
Coming from a family riddled in fear doubt violence and incest has an almost 'rockstar' status to it. In that you could barely meet anyone without them also being without the same to somw degree or the other!
Who is the one that has kept up the harassement?
These are the possible activities of the duplucitous
Possibly making contact with all neighbours employers so as to influence the way she has been treated?
Keeping up a very intimidatory presence any time she is public?
The need to over power her?
It seems to me that after moving away from Notting Hill which comes under the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Council areas to remove herself from that stalker she goes to live on the Kennington Park Estate initially a Lambeth council Estate turned over to Hyde Housing Association for good keeping after eventually getting on her feet whilst living on the Kennington Park Estate where due to her success a small amount of mobbing started after an entry of new residents I dare to say it is possible she was happened across by another stalker making her fresh start in the Peabody Buildings in the Duchy Street of Waterloo East almost impossible!
As a detective I am extremely and sadly intrigued that neighbourly activity against someone would be allowed to escalate to the level of jealous traffic mobbing violence it is today and allowed to continue for so many years!
There appears to be little objectivity or solace or respite offered to some tenants in such situations where a balance of power might have been left in the hands of some and not others. Hence when complaints are made by certain tenanats to such bodies like an ombudsman it would appear the approperiate resources and help cannot be applied because it is possible to be mobbed again and suffer "TV Show" style of hypnotism in public and attacked in your profession as a result because of who you are forced to live around and deal with due to the structure of power withun how the social housing landlord. Resident opportynity for involvement in the day to day running of a who they pay rent too was obviously set up to be a positive thing. But who structured the protection from being stalked? Violated? Tenants who roam the building intimintently all day long to see and check whose property they can intrude into? Who is protecting tenants who just want to lead a their life independant of working for the landlord they pay their rent too?
For too long behind the world of the need for recruitment references and housing there has been a regular abuse of power as well as mobile phone data theft and constant hacking as well as varying styles of intimidation which amounts to emotional abuse which amounts to the theft of copius amount of hours taken from a persons intimate life as they foot the bill to get over what is being done to them. Who is responsible for taking this into account the cost of being abused in social housing for each resident affected and the cost of housing and re-housing those who perpetrate?
Again, are personality disorders and other challenging behaviours responsible for prolonging the suffering of those already abused?
A landlord may do the good work of housing those vulnerable due to drug addiction and anti social behaviours as a result but how do the tenants who do not have those challenges really know how to pin point what that will really cost them...to be stalked, harrassed, assaulted even due to need to accept such a level of housing?
What about the possibilty of this case where years later there appears to be a repeat offence within the same family where the women diligently as possible even as a estranged family members go about their daily lufe yet within same borough ywars apart they are stalked assaulted and mobbed by female perpretrators?
Every neighbourhood?
Strikes me as kind of funny but not?
Its a sufference belueve it or not not of the one being mobbed.
The one who ia being mobbed stalked due to neighbourhood nosiness and anti-social behaviour does suffer and pick up the cost of the behaviour but that sufference does not include stuck!
A female obsessing about another female issues consistent and persistent jealously and jealous mobbing in traffic....all of sudden get there life together but all centered around who they are stalking? Roving salesman and woman who are always doing busuness only where that person is?
But when it can never get out and never be reported or responded to in correct manner then does the abiding sentence that it must be an inside job mean the crime is actually associated with a Police Officer? Or is that all part and parcel of the very first stalker?
No comments:
Post a Comment